The Gingrich campaign had hoped that, after 11 years of marriage, he could present himself as a stable family man. Now Mr. Gingrich is the butt of yet another round of late-night television infidelity jokes. “Five hundred thousand at Tiffany’s?” the comedian Stephen Colbert asked. “There’s a simple explanation. The guy clearly buys his engagement rings in bulk.”
But the glittering strand of diamonds that Mrs. Gingrich wore last month to the Washington premiere of the couple’s latest documentary movie looks strikingly like one that Tiffany advertises for $45,000. And Time magazine’s Web site on Tuesday posted a slide show of Mrs. Gingrich wearing various baubles that seemed straight out of the Tiffany catalog, including what looks like a $22,000 pair of diamond and gold starburst earrings “inspired by electrons orbiting in the nucleus of an atom.”
The Tiffany spokesman, Carson Glover, said the company offers customers a “revo *** ing credit card agreement” with state-specific rates; those who hold such cards are eligible for up to 12 months of interest-free borrowing if they spend more than $1,000 on an engagement ring or $5,000 on other merchandise.
The latest on President Obama, the new Congress and other news from Washington and around the nation. Join the
discussion.
Tiffany’s or knockoffs? The Gingrich campaign won’t say. But at this point, it no longer matters, according to political strategists of both parties. What matters, they say, is that the Tiffany story is sticking to Mr. Gingrich, helping to define — or perhaps redefine — him in the critical early days of his bid for the Republican presidential nomination.
WASHINGTON — To the long list of rich-guy foibles that turned into defining campaign moments — John Edwards’s $400 haircut, John Kerry’s kite-surfing, John McCain’s inability to remember how many homes he owns — let us now add Newt Gingrich’s $500,000 revo *** ing line of credit at the luxury jeweler Tiffany & Company.
FiveThirtyEight:
Nate Si *** er's Political Calculus
More
Politics News
As House speaker, Mr. Gingrich preached the virtues of fiscal conservatism; now he is struggling to explain how spending large sums on jewelry fits in with that philosophy. And while a spokesman for Tiffany confirmed Tuesday that Mr. Gingrich had paid the debt in full, with no interest, parrying questions about a six-figure jewelry bill is hardly what his campaign needs at a time when many Americans are out of work or have lost their homes.
The episode also reinforced what campaign strategists like to call “negatives” — in Mr. Gingrich’s case, questions about his personal life, which includes two divorces and a six-year secret affair with Mrs. Gingrich, then Callista Bisek, when she was a House aide and he was speaker.
On CBS News’s “Face the Nation,” Mr. Gingrich called the credit line a “standard, no-interest account.”
A $45,000 Tiffany necklace looks like one worn by Callista Gingrich.
Mr. Gingrich, who has grown wealthy in recent years by publishing books, making movies and delivering speeches, says it is not recklessness at all; on “Face the Nation,” he said that he owes no money except for his mortgage payments on one rental property in Wisconsin, his wife’s home state.
The way some voters out in the rest of America might see it, he’s a guy who paid more for jewelry than some people pay for their houses.
The Caucus
“If the U.S. government was as debt-free as I am, everybody in America would be celebrating,” he said. “I think I have proven I can manage money.”
Brendan Hoffman for The New York Times
Pandora si *** er beads,,,Politics
Home The Caucus FiveThirty
Eight G.O.P.
Candidates Inside
Congress Election
Results Poll
Watch Video
“It’s bizarre; I don’t think he’s ever going to live it down,” Mr. Robinson said. “There aren’t many $500,000 homes in Iowa, so we can’t even fathom $500,000 in credit card debt, let alone to a high-end jewelry store.”
Mr. Gingrich’s situation “is sort of a twofer, which is why it is particularly damaging,” said Chris Lehane, a Democratic strategist. It raises questions about his commitment to fiscal restraint, Mr. Lehane said, and also “plays into a prevailing story line about lack of discipline and being reckless, which has been a consistent part of his political and public life.”
Mr. Gingrich, of course, is hardly the first politician to become a sudden symbol of spending excess. In the 2008 campaign, Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee, presented herself to voters as an ordinary “hockey mom,” only to face revelations that the Republican Party had spent $150,000 on a designer wardrobe. Mr. Edwards styled himself “the son of a mill worker,” an image contradicted by his pricey haircut.
,,,,,cheap *** beads,Pandora si *** er charms bracelets,
“It’s not something that normal people do,” Mr. Galen said. “I understand he’s made a lot of money and he’s done very well, and God bless him for it, but that’s sort of a departure from the Newt Gingrich that I knew.”
It has been a week since Politico broke the news that while working for the House Agriculture Committee, Mr. Gingrich’s wife, Callista, filed forms for 2005 and 2006 disclosing her husband’s “revo *** ing charge” of $250,001 to $500,000 with Tiffany. Mr. Gingrich, insisting his jewelry buying habits are his own business, has declined to say what he bought.
In Iowa, where Mr. Gingrich drew big crowds last week, The Iowa Republican, a political Web site, ran a scathing commentary titled “How a Fiscal Conservative Spends $500K at Tiffany’s.” The site’s editor, Craig Robinson, a former political director for the state Republican Party, said the essay was submitted by a political activist who was “completely turned off” by the expenditures.
Callista Gingrich sparkled at a screening.
But out in Iowa, Mr. Robinson says buying jewelry on credit somehow feels different from buying a refrigerator or a new washing machine. Rich Galen, a former Gingrich aide, agrees.
The way Mr. Gingrich sees it, as he said on “Face the Nation” on Sunday, he’s “a guy running for president who pays all of his bills,” who lives within his budget and who is in fact “very frugal.”
